When Jon lived stateside, we used to talk about three times a day. Usually short conversations about stupid things like this guy on a bike who was totally drunk or this quote in a book that made me laugh or I would totally rather be talking to you than doing my homework.
Now that he’s in England, it’s harder to talk on the phone, but we’ve started scheduling times to skype online, which is like a video phone and v nice. Anyway, we chatted today about how to ditch the moldiness that passed for Christianese and talk about the concepts in language that makes sense without all that ghastly baggage. A modern reinterpretation of the medieval beatific vision was, I think, Jon’s phrase.
Was trying to explain this to M at lunch when she asked how Jon was doing, and it rapidly turned into a Your Generation conversation. We have those a lot. Doesn’t especially bother me, because I think we both walk away feeling equally justified, but it’s strange.
My mother says “your generation” when I think what she really means is “you at your potential worst.” You know what I mean: the drug generation, the video game generation, the grubby-jeaned little punks who don’t believe in absolute truth.
I tend to think of her generation as cold, duty-oriented little modernist with their how-to guides and their crispy social norms and American Dream. I readily admit I would rather be perusing my field guide of eastern religions, doing yoga, and practicing centering Christian meditation.
Why it took me this long to realize, I don’t know, but I noticed today that we have rapidly become a kind of ludicrous cartoon strip.
Creedal vs. experiential. Organized vs. independent. Two sides, one coin. We still believe all the same things. I guess it’s just amusing to me (probably to both of us), how generationally-bound we really are.
Although, okay, confession: it causes slight narrowing of the eyes when one’s entire generation is accused of not believing in any kind of absolute truth. Tired argument, anyway. Of c we believe in truth, I think there’s just been a legitimate cynicism about who’s truth is being touted as absolute and what the agenda behind that might be.
Somewhere along the line we got off on church attendance as a generational thing.
It’s a little hard, I said (have just finished listening to Love Among the Chickens by Wodehouse, and yes, I hear that phrase in a particular kind of Ukridge voice), to be faced with the responsibility of a whole generation’s lukewarm interest in “church” and have that disinterest be blamed merely on a style of music or length of sermons. I’ll tell you frankly enough that church as a Sunday morning institution is probably the least visibly, spiritually useful part of my week. I don’t think it has anything to do with music style. I don’t think it has much to do with length of sermon or order of the service or even whether or not women are allowed to speak.
I think it’s funny that those things are what we spend our time arguing about, as though there is some magical combination that will revitalized the spiritual community. I think it’s funny that we assume the young generation has an inordinate need to be entertained instead of assuming that maybe the church itself is what’s unhealthy.
Maybe our drugged and medicated generation is still young enough to be sensitive to the fact that our churches are pretty materialistic and American dreamy and spiritually reserved. Maybe we know when we’re being babysat with Sunday school classes that a wide-awake toddler could ace.
Dunno. Something I find myself contemplating as I crunch my way through a packet of Easter Peeps. It’s also a good way to avoid writing. Have done a thousand words so far today, but should do at least two or three. We’ll see. The day’s still young.